°µÍø½ûÇø

But the sponsor says the law will ease voter concerns and stop counties from interpreting existing law in different ways.

“It’s a confidence bill,� said Georgia Senate Ethics Committee Chairman Max Burns, a Republican from Sylvania. “It’s the ability to make sure, as we implement Georgia law, we follow it consistently. There are a lot of counties who are interpreting the law differently.�

, rewritten Monday, would make it easier to challenge the eligibility of voters, require county officials to record video of every ballot drop box, ban counties from hiring election workers who aren't American citizens and let counties opt out of the state's electronic ballot markers in favor of paper ballots.

A separate measure seeks to make it a felony for county officials to take private money to pay for elections, after Republican attacks on a suburban Atlanta county for taking such money.

The new language reacts to the fears of Republican primary voters who still believe that balloting in Georgia is insecure, despite the state's 2022 election being conducted without widespread controversy. It would build on the , enacted over bitter opposition, which said every voter in the state could submit an , shortened the period to , and before a runoff election

The measure has a long way to go before becoming law, with changes still being proposed. But this year's proposal could make it possible for activists who have been challenging tens of thousands of registrations across Georgia to knock those voters off the rolls based only on their names appearing on the address change database maintained by the U.S. Postal Service.

County officials have been rejecting most of those challenges, saying that residence, for voting purposes, is more complicated than appearing on a change-of-address list. Officials have generally ruled that a challenger must have first-hand knowledge of someone being unqualified, instead of picking names off a list. But Burns said that he wants counties to require a hearing and possibly remove someone from the rolls based on the lists.

“The most important thing is to ensure that everyone on our voter rolls is a legitimate, legal voter," Burns said.

Challenges would be thrown out if someone could prove they were in military service, a student attending college away from home, or in federal service in Washington, D.C. But opponents say the list is inaccurate and that the state shouldn't shift the burden of staying on the rolls back onto voters.

“Every single one of those people has to answer to a voter challenge. That’s how it’s going to work,� said Vasu Abhiraman, a lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union of Georgia. “The conspiracy theorists are going to dig up their names from the change of address registries and they’re going to try to disenfranchise them.�

The measure also strikes at another target of election deniers — ballot drop boxes. Georgia first used drop boxes under an emergency rule during the pandemic in 2020. But Republican activists besieged lawmakers in 2021 with claims that Democrats illegally collected and dropped off ballots at unattended outdoor boxes. The 2021 law codified the use of boxes, but limited how many could be used, requiring that they be inside early in-person voting locations and constantly watched.

The new bill would go further, requiring all of Georgia's 159 counties to record video of every drop box, including making sure “the faces of each person using the drop box are visible," and make that video freely available online, retaining it for at least four years. The bill would also say that people must feed absentee ballots into a drop box one at a time. At least one Georgia man who was recorded dropping off ballots in 2020 .

Videos of drop boxes, including some where voters inserted multiple ballots, were a centerpiece of election conspiracy theories, including that suggested Democratic-aligned operatives were supposedly paid to illegally collect and drop off ballots.

would make it a felony for county officials to accept money beyond their own tax revenue, except from the state or federal government, to run elections. It's an amplification of a provision from the 2021 law that made it illegal for elections officials to accept outside money, after Republicans grew alarmed that Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg to election officials nationwide.

Recently, suburban Atlanta's DeKalb County accepted $2 million from the U.S. Alliance for Election Excellence to seek improvements and share best practices. The alliance includes the Center for Tech and Civic Life, Zuckerberg's main funding vehicle from 2020. That set off a round of condemnations from Republicans that DeKalb had broken the law.

“The high ranking of employees of DeKalb County and its Democrat Party-appointed chairwoman of its board of elections have conspired to intentionally violate the Election Integrity Act of 2021,� DeKalb County Republican Party Chairwoman Marci McCarthy told the committee Monday.

However, the county commission and not the election office accepted the money, and some have said it is still legal for elected county commissioners to take such grants.

“Pursuing grant funding to supplement operating budgets is a standard and ethical practice for county governments across this state,� DeKalb County Board of Registrations and Elections member Karli Swift told the committee Monday. “And contrary to the insinuation in ... this bill, once a county board of commissioners accepts funds and appropriates them, they lawfully become appropriated public funds.�

___

Follow Jeff Amy on Twitter at .