Judges arrive at the United Nations' highest court to open historic hearings in The Hague, Netherlands, Monday, Feb. 19, 2024. Historic hearings have opened at the United Nations’ top court into the legality of Israel’s 57-year occupation of lands sought for a Palestinian state. Canada has abandoned plans to make oral submissions to the hearing. THE CANADIAN PRESS/AP-Peter Dejong
Judges arrive at the United Nations' highest court to open historic hearings in The Hague, Netherlands, Monday, Feb. 19, 2024. Historic hearings have opened at the United Nations’ top court into the legality of Israel’s 57-year occupation of lands sought for a Palestinian state. Canada has abandoned plans to make oral submissions to the hearing. THE CANADIAN PRESS/AP-Peter Dejong
PDJOTTAWA - Canada nixed plans Tuesday to make oral arguments at the International Court of Justice about Israel's occupation of the Palestinian territories.
The world court is hearing arguments this week in response to the UN General Assembly's request for a non-binding opinion on the potential legal consequences of Israel's policies and practices in the region.
With the case playing out against the backdrop of the Israel-Hamas war, Canada has opted to fall back on the position it has held since July of last year: that such an opinion would do more harm than good.
A spokesperson for Global Affairs Canada said that an oral submission was unnecessary because the government's position, while still relevant, has not changed.
In a written submission from last summer, Canada said it should fall to the UN Security Council, not the General Assembly, to help broker a negotiated peace.
Direct dialogue between the parties themselves is the best path to create the conditions for a lasting peace, with the ultimate goal of a two-state solution, it argued.
"Canada is concerned that the issuance of an advisory opinion on Israeli practices in the occupied territories may contribute to a polarization of positions that risks moving the parties further away from a just and lasting resolution to the conflict," read the July 14 letter.
The court was first asked in December 2022 to provide an advisory opinion, which would be separate from the genocide case brought by South Africa against Israel.
This report by °µÍø½ûÇø was first published Feb. 20, 2024.
— With files from The Associated Press
°µÍø½ûÇø. All rights reserved.
Get the latest from °µÍø½ûÇø News in your inbox. Select the emails you're interested in below.
“We should be the Taylor Swift of financial institutions.â€
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
